The application asks the first time that the license EULA is accepted, once accepted, it is possible to cover with the appropriate button in the menu.
It has been provided a custom keyboard, to exit the impending Cupcake, which will introduce the virtual keyboard.
Using the hardware keyboard, the virtual one is hidden. you type in your hometown is done the research from which you can choose not to make mistakes in the case of multiple choices you can choose the province.
clicking on the button with the image of the tax code is calculated that can be copied using the button "Copy."
Memory Management
The application startup, copy the database of cities, then the application calculates the code to close the application automatically deletes the database, this reduces the memory footprint of about 350KB. Wanting to improve performance in terms of time sufficient to launch the application menu, "Memory Management", check "No Deleting Database Automatically" in this way will improve the startup performance of the application at the expense, however, employment of memory goes from about 350KB to about 700Kb
Listening to the words spoken by Berlusconi at the April 25 (the full text of the site including the comments) I could not repress a deep sense of anguish. I first felt discomfort for sinister political operation in which the prime minister wishes to convert the Liberation Day in celebration of freedom (I wonder if you do not want to make the celebration of his party ... you know, in a country like Italy inattentive there is a risk that in twenty years people think of April 25 in the first instance as the party of the "party of freedom"). The chairman of the desire clearly rise to the role of peacemaker appropriate national liberation; the problem is that this "peace" seems to take the case of forced assimilation. This is a subtle game, rename it to something involving the possession, the new festival of freedom would be in effect a creature Berlusconi. The April 25 will also be a feast for all Italians, but there is no doubt that it has much more value for a certain political party for another; amendment that certain distinctive characteristics "of some" change her name, accept the role of subjects 'other' than partisans (I am referring to "boys of Salò") means not only changing structures and severely distorting the system of values, but also in the long run, result in a shift of meaning. But if you can, this is not what most of all I did send a shiver down my spine, but the use made by Berlusconi of the term liberty are certain years that he has "bought" that word, but For the first time, he transforms into a religion (the exact words were: "Our freedom of religion"-note the plural possessive ... is a nous ? -).
All this made me think, I can not help wondering what kind of freedom he wants to propose, and what are the tenets of this "religion." So what is freedom? And which seem difficult question today. I'm not sure that there is a answer. To begin with "freedom" is a name, a time limit. If you stop to this, the title of my post can only look foolish, do not be afraid of a word! Of course not, but the problem (and nice) word is that they are signs of something else, then be afraid of a word means fear the sense that it is given and the manner in which it is used. So you could say that I'm afraid of a particular concept of freedom which does not coincide with mine. This certainly makes things more plausible, but it is not entirely correct, or at least it's not in my case. The dialogue, Socratic understood, after all, is precisely to eliminate the terror to points different views, disagreement arises from the dialectic process which, if pursued with sincerity, can only lead to more reasonable positions. What remains, then, that can scare me? remains a paradox. One for which the specific meaning of the word "freedom" is indeterminate, absolute. I do not have that fear of a particular concept, but the fact that this particular concept is not determined. What does this mean? It means that, flaunting the banner of freedom in a completely abstract leads to an emptying of meaning. The freedom in abstract terms, like "religion" is indeterminate, is empty, and it is despotic, just not as absolute that can be dogmatic. The religion of freedom is the trace of the more subtle dictatorship, that of thought. The freedom to be filled with meaning and not remain a nulleggia nothing in the sea of \u200b\u200bpopulist verbiage, should contact the concrete must be placed in its historical context, as specified in its rough and several materials. E 'of a problem that comes the need to experience a certain freedom, freedom is plural and therefore in some way contingent on its context that is historical and geographical, is not a transcendent, ontologically higher; a deity whose ara consecrate our lives. I come back to mind the prophetic words almost written back in 1988 by Ludovico Geymonat in his essay entitled (precisely): "Freedom". "[...] The acceptance of this view (NDA of freedom as absolute) may ultimately take us in an unconscious way so typical of the religious mentality. In line with the religious struggles are contrasted a true religion against all other forms of religion (false), so now we are inclined to oppose true freedom (nda: that is transcendent, absolute) against all historical approximations of freedom. [... ] Historical examples are really and should give pause to many: think of the United States, also with their foreign policy claim to "bring freedom" to other peoples. In reality the United States "bring freedom" to other countries by a method not unlike that with which Christian countries "brought Christianity" to the "infidels." [...] We have to challenge the defenders of "freedom" to fall from the top of the abstract principles on the concrete floor of injustice. " why" Liberation "says much more than" freedom "at this juncture, is April 25 was something concrete, a material release from a concrete system of injustice (the ones perpetrated by the fascism) ; replaced by a sleight of liberation with the ambiguous and neutral term of freedom, which, if not specified, does not mean anything, it's harmful. the risk of becoming slaves to freedom ossannanti so empty as to be mere flatus vocis.
Hello to everybody, I inform you that since Thursday 25 September to Sunday 28th, will be held in Piacenza, the first Festival of the law under the direction of Stefano Rodota. In recent months I have stretched out to the organizers of the festival and presented a project on behalf of THE ATOM (Arcigay Piacenza), which has as its object the issue of new families. The project was in part accepted and included in the event program. Thursday, September 25 at the Auditorium S. Ilario (Via Garibaldi n. 17) Piacenza at 21, there will be a screening of the documentary film "Suddenly, Last Winter," preceded by the activation of Valerian Scassa (Chairman of the Atom), who will discuss the activities of 'Association of Piacenza and what leads to the presence or absence of legislation to protect unmarried couples in a legal system, and my, during which I will discuss the ethical implications of the founding principles of the Constitution regarding this matter Please join the new famiglie.Vi numerous and alert as many people as possible. the link of the Festival of the law is as follows, there you will find the full schedule and maps to find us: http://www.festivaldeldiritto.it/index.php A big hug to everybody DOMENICO Alfarone
Today, the catastrophe of the articles I've read that fits well with my mood .... that is, perhaps my scorn of the world are in complete emotional contiguity with it; despise him because he is despicable and despised by itself and in an attempt to despise so it seems appropriate to bask in the inevitability of the outcome its evolution: the world dies to himself as if his primary function was her own extinction .... If today I were in the Middle Ages (to play at a time paradox) I'd probably be one of those mad monks who preaches the " contemptus mundi" through the exile from the world .... yet there are so entangled-of-fact to understand it and contribute to his being at the very moment when the judge unacceptable and incomprehensible, in a bid to emerge from its sewage all I do is sinking deeper. I always thought there was a vast difference between those who want to change the world and who wants to destroy or will it shrink ... Today nell'incostante schizophrenia positions I support this difference seems to be so poor result in a mere matter of words. Strictly speaking, changing the world is how to destroy what is, or rather the renewal, rebirth, necessarily involves a death before a conflagration can be reborn from the ashes in the 'Other', and yet I feel inside me the invincible belief that this "new other" inevitably become an "old identity", but then the flight is perhaps the most reasonable outcome? ANACHOREO , I pick ... is the answer? I do not know, indeed, no, definitely not, why is nothing but a manifestation of the same system, escape from the system becomes a way to propose it again, and the idea to carve out on the poor image of the Hermit, only makes me feel chained to a destiny I guess, trying to escape I would not be just a card dealt from the deck of tarot cards ... among others. So? So no, I never said that my remarks today want to have a prophetic sense or would act as the prospect of an act or an act not, only the implementation language of the questions that today (and fortunately not many other day of the year), I embrace it. Finally, just to celebrate the eternal return to the real inherent in wanting to escape my change-destroy-reference to what I read:
